Aggressive inlining is one way, but specialisation ought to get a long way, and 
makes fewer copies of the specialised code.

It’s hard to help without a concrete example

Simon

From: ghc-devs [mailto:ghc-devs-boun...@haskell.org] On Behalf Of Conal Elliott
Sent: 28 January 2016 00:05
To: ghc-devs@haskell.org
Subject: More aggressive dictionary removal?

I'm looking for pointers on getting GHC to eliminate more overloading & 
polymorphism. I think this sort of thing mainly happens in the Specialise 
module. The default GHC flag settings get me a couple levels of 
monomorphization and dictionary removal, but I want to go further. I've tried 
-fspecialise-aggressively, but it didn't seem to make a difference, and I 
haven't found this flag described in the GHC user's guide. Anyone have pointers 
to more information?
Thanks, - Conal
_______________________________________________
ghc-devs mailing list
ghc-devs@haskell.org
http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs

Reply via email to