> Ben Gamari <b...@smart-cactus.org>: > builds. In effect the message to users would be, > > "yes, unboxed types exist and they are now on sound theoretical > footing, but they are still largely an implementation detail, just as > they have always been. If you want to use them you need to know > where to look." > > Perhaps this can be revisited at some point in the future when we have a > better story for a beginner's Prelude but for now I'm not sure we want > to subject everyone to these new types. > > Anyways, this is just my two cents. It would be nice to hear what others > think.
Sounds like a good plan to me. Manuel _______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list ghc-devs@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
