Dear list, in the literature, the code and the comments, I often find these notions: * updatable * single-entry * one-shot applied to thunks, functions, closures and lambda expressions on various levels
I have the impression that these are indeed plain synonyms (resp. antinyms) when it comes to thunks and other closures, and indicate whether a dynamic instance of this closure is going to be entered once or more than once, while "one-shot", when applied to a lambda expression (or, by extension function argument), indicates that this lambda expression is _called_ at most once for every _evaluation_ of it. Is that about right, or are there more pitfalls around? Greetings, Joachim -- Joachim “nomeata” Breitner [email protected] • https://www.joachim-breitner.de/ XMPP: [email protected] • OpenPGP-Key: 0xF0FBF51F Debian Developer: [email protected]
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list [email protected] http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
