Andrés Sicard-Ramírez <[email protected]> writes: > On 10 April 2016 at 20:55, Ben Gamari <[email protected]> wrote: >> I've pushed a new tarball based on >> 9c48d8a02dd80bba3bd313bc52add841530e28dc. I have pushed essentially >> everything into this candidate that I expect will go into 8.0.1. It >> validates but it isn't nearly as well tested as the previous tree. I'll >> try doing some further builds tomorrow and let you all know if anything >> goes awry. > > From running `./configure` on > > > http://downloads.haskell.org/~ghc/8.0.1-rc3/ghc-8.0.0.20160408-x86_64-unknown-linux.tar.xz > This binary distribution was uploaded unintentionally and was built for general public consumption. Our binary distributions won't be built with libdw support
> it seems that the required version of elfutils is 0.158, however this > version of elfutils is not checked when running `./configure` on > > http://downloads.haskell.org/~ghc/8.0.1-rc3/ghc-8.0.0.20160411-src.tar.xz > > That is, instead of get an error on configuration time because my > version of elfutils is too old, I get an error on compilation time. > Ahhh, yes, it seems like neither the source nor binary distribution configure scripts actually check for the libdw version. Thanks for noticing this! I've opened #11820 to track this and D2103 with what I believe is a fix. Cheers, - Ben
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list [email protected] http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
