| > It's a bit of a shame that type inference doesn't give you a reliable | > order, but I suppose if you rely on -XTypeApplications working a | > certain way, you're taking a risk by NOT using a forall. | | Inference is meant to give you a reliable ordering. If it's not, that's a | bug!
I thought that inferred foralls are Invisible binders (see Note [TyBinders and VisibilityFlags]); and you can't use visible type application for Invisible binders. I thought that was because it's hard to specify the order of inferred type variable, just as Ryan says. So /is/ inference meant to give a reliable ordering? If so why? Also I don't understand why Ryan needs a reliable ordering. So you can see I'm a bit confused here Simon _______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list [email protected] http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
