Yes, but none of that has anything to do with a walk over the data type, as
deriving(Functor) does!
You are right that what we need is the result of simplifying the instantiated
constraint
(Generic [a], GC (Rep [a]))
Simplify that constraint (simplifyDeriv does that), including reducing
type-function applications, and that’s your context.
But no need to look at the data type’s constructors, as deriving(Functor) does.
Simon
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On
Behalf Of José Pedro Magalhães
Sent: 18 June 2016 09:16
To: Simon Peyton Jones <[email protected]>
Cc: Ryan Scott <[email protected]>; Andres Löh <[email protected]>;
GHC developers <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Inferring instance constraints with DeriveAnyClass
I still don't think you can do it just from the default method's type. A
typical case is the following:
class C a where
op :: a -> Int
default op :: (Generic a, GC (Rep a)) => a -> Int
When giving an instance C [a], you might well find out that you need C a =>,
but this is not something
you can see in the type of the default method; it follows only after the
expansion of Rep [a] and resolving
the GC constraint a number of times.
Best regards,
Pedro
On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 12:43 PM, Simon Peyton Jones
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
| My question is then: why does DeriveAnyClass take the bizarre approach
| of co-opting the DeriveFunctor algorithm? Andres, you originally
| proposed this in #7346 [2], but I don't quite understand why you
| wanted to do it this way. Couldn't we infer the context simply from
| the contexts of the default method type signatures?
That last suggestion makes perfect sense to me. After all, we are going to
generate an instance looking like
instance .. => C (T a) where
op1 = <default-op1>
op2 = <default-op2>
so all we need in ".." is enough context to satisfy the needs of <default-op1>
etc.
Well, you need to take account of the class op type sig too:
class C a where
op :: Eq a => a -> a
default op :: (Eq a, Show a) => a -> a
We effectively define
default_op :: (Eq a, Show a) => a -> a
Now with DeriveAnyClass for lists, we effectively get
instance ... => C [a] where
op = default_op
What is ..? Well, we need (Eq [a], Show [a]); but we are given Eq [a] (because
that's op's instantiated type. So Show a is all we need in the end.
Simon
_______________________________________________
ghc-devs mailing list
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3a%2f%2fmail.haskell.org%2fcgi-bin%2fmailman%2flistinfo%2fghc-devs&data=01%7c01%7csimonpj%40064d.mgd.microsoft.com%7cb6b18be0b6ac490d83ae08d39750c6cf%7c72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7c1&sdata=hXiE2P63QGD4ZAFonWpDvqc0vKX%2fBPgPYVBAjIiaIXw%3d>
_______________________________________________
ghc-devs mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
