Ugh. I validated that patch before committing and validated many times after that patch. Are you using a 32bit system? Maybe we should bump the numbers for 32bit builds too.
I'm hesitant to mark the test broken because I'm afraid that the numbers will increase if we stop testing for allocations/residency completely. I think temporarily bumping numbers is better than temporarily disabling it. What are the numbers you're getting? 2016-08-17 14:16 GMT+00:00 Matthew Pickering <matthewtpicker...@gmail.com>: > Hi all, > > https://phabricator.haskell.org/rGHC773e3aadac4bbee9a0173ebc90ffdc9458a2a3a9 > > broke the build by re-enabling the test T1969 > > The ticket tracking this is: https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/12437 > > Omer: Is it best to revert this patch and mark the test broken again? > > Matt _______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list ghc-devs@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
