On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 7:05 PM, Brandon Allbery <allber...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 10:02 PM, Michael Sloan <mgsl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> What if instead we re-framed this as a "top-level where clause", like
>> this:
>>
>> main :: IO ()
>> main = putStrLn ("Hi" <> "There")
>>
>> other-function :: IO ()
>> other-function = putStrLn ("I can " <> "also use it")
>>
>> -- NOTE: 0 indent!
>>
>> where
>> (<>) :: String -> String -> String
>> (<>) = (++)
>
>
> This would actually be slightly odd parse-wise, as we're already *in* an
> unindented where clause (module ... where)
Ahh, of course! Good point, that makes this idea rather unappealing -
it is indeed inconsistent. Just throwing ideas out there!
> --
> brandon s allbery kf8nh sine nomine associates
> allber...@gmail.com ballb...@sinenomine.net
> unix, openafs, kerberos, infrastructure, xmonad http://sinenomine.net
_______________________________________________
ghc-devs mailing list
ghc-devs@haskell.org
http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
