Michal Terepeta <michal.terep...@gmail.com> writes: > Hi everyone, > > I've been running nofib a few times recently to see the effect of some > changes > on compile time (not the runtime of the compiled program). And I've started > wondering how representative nofib is when it comes to measuring compile > time > and compiler allocations? It seems that most of the nofib programs compile > really quickly... > > Is there some collections of modules/libraries/applications that were put > together with the purpose of benchmarking GHC itself and I just haven't > seen/found it? > Sadly no; I've put out a number of calls for minimal programs (e.g. small, fairly free-standing real-world applications) but the response hasn't been terribly strong. I frankly can't blame people for not wanting to take the time to strip out dependencies from their working programs. Joachim and I have previously discussed the possibility of manually collecting a set of popular Hackage libraries on a regular basis for use in compiler performance characterization.
Cheers, - Ben
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list ghc-devs@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
