Simon Peyton Jones via ghc-devs <[email protected]> writes: > My clean build of origin/master, on 64-bit Linux is showing these failures > > Unexpected failures: > > /tmp/ghctest-5_qx1p/test spaces/./pmcheck/should_compile/T11195.run > T11195 [exit code non-0] (normal) > > > > Unexpected stat failures: > > /tmp/ghctest-5_qx1p/test spaces/./perf/compiler/T5837.run T5837 [stat > too good] (normal) > > /tmp/ghctest-5_qx1p/test spaces/./perf/compiler/T12234.run T12234 [stat > too good] (optasm) > > (I do wish the summary omitted those long paths; makes it hard to read.) > I'm happy about the perf improvements, but why don't they happen for other > people?
I bumped the allocation numbers for T12234 yesterday as it was failing on Darwin. It currently passes for my on x86_64/Linux. I'm not sure what to make of this. It quite frustrating how much environmental sensitivity these tests have. I personally this this is good motivation to follow through on #12758. > T11195 is a very long-running pattern-match perf test that regularly > fails on a heavily loaded machine, with a timeout. It's very tiresome, > but I don't think it's a regression. Yes, I have seen this on a few occassions, but not recently. I'm not sure what we can do other than bumping the timeout a bit. Cheers, - Ben
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list [email protected] http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
