Michal Terepeta <[email protected]> writes: > Hi all, > ... > > What do you think? Does anyone think we shouldn't do this? > I think this seems quite reasonable. Given that hoopl will need changes to be truly useful to GHC, it seems quite reasonable to take the parts we need and iterate independently on the rest.
Cheers, - Ben
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list [email protected] http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
