Bardur Arantsson <s...@scientician.net> writes: > I may be missing something since I have only quickly skimmed the thread, > but...: Why not track all of these things and correlate them with > individual runs? The Linux 'perf' tool can retrieve a *lot* of > interesting numbers, esp. around cache hit rates, branch predicition hit > rates, etc. > While it's not a bad idea, I think it's easy to drown in information. Of course, it's also fairly easy to hide information that we don't care about, so perhaps this is worth doing regardless.
Cheers, - Ben
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list ghc-devs@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
