Hi Ben, > Well, the GitHub repo will still exist. Is that enough?
Yes, but I think I'll need to do some clean up in the code so that it's obvious where to look for answers. For example, here is a random comment from a Hadrian source file: -- Objdump is only required on OpenBSD and AIX, as mentioned in #211. The reader might confuse this with GHC ticket #211, so I guess this should be replaced with a full link https://github.com/snowleopard/hadrian/issues/211. There may be other potential pitfalls, but hopefully nothing difficult to handle. I've created an issue to discuss and prepare for the merge: https://github.com/snowleopard/hadrian/issues/440. Cheers, Andrey -----Original Message----- From: Ben Gamari [mailto:b...@well-typed.com] Sent: 19 October 2017 21:50 To: Andrey Mokhov <andrey.mok...@newcastle.ac.uk>; Boespflug, Mathieu <m...@tweag.io> Cc: Jonas Pfenniger Chevalier <jonas.cheval...@tweag.io>; Manuel M T Chakravarty <manuel.chakrava...@tweag.io>; ghc-devs <ghc-devs@haskell.org> Subject: RE: Hadrian Andrey Mokhov <andrey.mok...@newcastle.ac.uk> writes: > Thanks Ben, > > Just to clarify: By history I mean not just commits, but GitHub issues > and PRs as well -- together they contain a lot of valuable interlinked > information for GHC/Hadrian developers. > Well, the GitHub repo will still exist. Is that enough? Cheers, - Ben _______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list ghc-devs@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
