On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 4:30 AM, Sven Panne <svenpa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I think this is a question of perspective: Having the master repository on > GitHub doesn't mean you are in immediate danger or lose your "family > jewels". IMHO it's quite the contrary: I'm e.g. sure that in case that > something goes wrong with GitHub, there is far more manpower behind it to > fix that than for any self-hosted repository. And you can of course have > some mirror of your GitHub repo in case of e.g. an earthquake/meteor/... in > the San Francisco area... ;-) > You're also assuming github doesn't suddenly pull a SourceForge (or a Gitorious for that matter). Business cares not what it steamrolls in the name of profit. I fail to understand why, with multiple examples of the folly of this belief out there, people are still willing to bet on *this* company being *different* from all others and absolutely safe to trust. -- brandon s allbery kf8nh sine nomine associates allber...@gmail.com ballb...@sinenomine.net unix, openafs, kerberos, infrastructure, xmonad http://sinenomine.net
_______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list ghc-devs@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
