I don't think anyone has run nofib on the rebased branch yet. The Akio2017 subpage is a more accurate summary. Sebastian has also been adding notes to explain the more intricate parts.
Matt On Fri, Dec 22, 2017 at 5:27 PM, Simon Peyton Jones <[email protected]> wrote: > Terrific! > > What are the nofib results? > > Can we have a couple of artificial benchmarks in cpranal/should_run that show > substantial perf improvements because the nested CPR wins in some inner loop? > > Is https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/wiki/NestedCPR still an accurate summary > of the idea? And the Akio2017 sub-page? It would be easier to review the > code if the design documentation accurately described it. > > I'll look in the new year. Thanks! > > Simon > > | -----Original Message----- > | From: Matthew Pickering [mailto:[email protected]] > | Sent: 22 December 2017 17:09 > | To: GHC developers <[email protected]>; Simon Peyton Jones > | <[email protected]>; Joachim Breitner <[email protected]>; > | [email protected]; Sebastian Graf <[email protected]> > | Subject: Nested CPR patch review > | > | Hi all, > | > | I recently resurrected akio's nested cpr branch and put it on phabricator > | for review. > | > | https://phabricator.haskell.org/D4244 > | > | Sebastian has kindly been going over it and ironed out a few kinks in the > | last few days. He says now that he believes the patch is correct. > | > | Is there anything else which needs to be done before merging this patch? > | > | Simon, would you perhaps be able to give the patch a look over? > | > | Cheers, > | > | Matt _______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list [email protected] http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
