Or maybe "pattern ascription"? "type-ascription" is implied as "ascription" isn't commonly used for something else (AFAIK).

Sylvain


On 08/01/2018 13:59, Simon Peyton Jones via ghc-devs wrote:

I like the idea of distinguishing “signatures” from “annotations”.

But then what is currently a “pattern signature” with extension -XPatternSignatures, becomes “type annotation in a pattern” or perhaps “pattern type-annotation” which is a bit clumsy.

Possibly “type specification” instead of “type annotation”.  Thus “pattern type-spec” which is snappier.

Simon

*From:*ghc-devs [mailto:ghc-devs-boun...@haskell.org] *On Behalf Of *Spiwack, Arnaud
*Sent:* 08 January 2018 10:11
*Cc:* Joachim Breitner <m...@joachim-breitner.de>; ghc-devs@haskell.org
*Subject:* Re: pattern signatures

In my eyes, signatures are something which goes with a definition.

So (a) is a pattern (synonym) signature, while (b) is merely a type annotation on a pattern.

On Fri, Jan 5, 2018 at 11:23 PM, Iavor Diatchki <iavor.diatc...@gmail.com <mailto:iavor.diatc...@gmail.com>> wrote:

    Well, as you say, "pattern signature" makes sense for both, so I
    would expect to use context to disambiguate.  If I wanted to be
    explicit about which one I meant, I'd use:

    a) "Pattern synonym signature"

    b) "Signature on a pattern"

    -Iavor

    On Fri, Jan 5, 2018 at 1:12 PM Joachim Breitner
    <m...@joachim-breitner.de <mailto:m...@joachim-breitner.de>> wrote:

        Hi,

        Am Freitag, den 05.01.2018, 13:42 -0500 schrieb Brandon Allbery:
        > Further complicated by the fact that that form used to be
        called a
        > "pattern signature" with accompanying extension, until that was
        > folded into ScopedTypeVariables extension.

        which I find super confusing, because sometimes I want a
        signature on a
        pattern and it is counter-intuitive to me why I should not
        longer use
        the obviously named PatternSignatures extension but rather the
        at first
        glance unrelated ScopedTypeVariable extension.

        But I am derailing the discussion a bit.

        Cheers,
        Joachim

        --
        Joachim Breitner
        m...@joachim-breitner.de <mailto:m...@joachim-breitner.de>
        http://www.joachim-breitner.de/
        
<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.joachim-breitner.de%2F&data=02%7C01%7Csimonpj%40microsoft.com%7Ccca9ff6f4b2b4a32e61308d55680514e%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C636510031494207475&sdata=%2BWGJXq6S7IrWJzsYIZWdk%2BDa%2BSLtW8CfCiPHitgnArc%3D&reserved=0>

        _______________________________________________
        ghc-devs mailing list
        ghc-devs@haskell.org <mailto:ghc-devs@haskell.org>
        http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
        
<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fmail.haskell.org%2Fcgi-bin%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fghc-devs&data=02%7C01%7Csimonpj%40microsoft.com%7Ccca9ff6f4b2b4a32e61308d55680514e%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C636510031494207475&sdata=L7reldRrJzSuxRhDTFUgNoy8zXHEbW96rqY8TpUeHxI%3D&reserved=0>


    _______________________________________________
    ghc-devs mailing list
    ghc-devs@haskell.org <mailto:ghc-devs@haskell.org>
    http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
    
<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fmail.haskell.org%2Fcgi-bin%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fghc-devs&data=02%7C01%7Csimonpj%40microsoft.com%7Ccca9ff6f4b2b4a32e61308d55680514e%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C636510031494207475&sdata=L7reldRrJzSuxRhDTFUgNoy8zXHEbW96rqY8TpUeHxI%3D&reserved=0>



_______________________________________________
ghc-devs mailing list
ghc-devs@haskell.org
http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs

_______________________________________________
ghc-devs mailing list
ghc-devs@haskell.org
http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs

Reply via email to