"Victor Miraldo (UU)" <[email protected]> writes: > Hello, > > @Ben > >> I tried 8.4 and indeed the renamer/typechecker takes dramatically less >> memory (yay!), leaving desugar as the largest allocator (allocating >> around 3GB) while compiling the minimal example. Furthermore, disabling >> the pattern match checker (via -fmax-pmcheck-iterations=0) dramatically >> reduces desugarer allocations (to around 60MByte). It looks like you are >> right. > > I have just tried compiling my code with 8.4.2 and using > -fmax-pmcheck-iterations=0, > I gave GHC 12GB of ram and it still ran out (through `ulimit > -v$((1024*1024*12))`). > Hmmm, I'm a bit confused. Why are our results so different? How precisely are you invoking GHC?
> @Simon > >> Let's make a Trac ticket for this (since there is a nice small >> reproducer). Or, if it seems a dup, attach the reproducer to some >> existing ticket. > > Should I be the one creating it or adding the reproducer? > The closest I've seen is: https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/11195 > Let's start with a fresh ticket; #11195 has a rather long history. Do you think you could open it and attach your repro? Cheers, - Ben
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list [email protected] http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
