One question I don't remember seeing resolved. Will we still be able to use the old data constructor syntax and (fully applied) type constructor syntax? These are used a good bit in the wild.
On Wed, Apr 25, 2018, 1:34 PM Simon Peyton Jones via Libraries < librar...@haskell.org> wrote: > OK great, thanks. Solo# is it. Adding ghc-devs: would someone like to > make a patch? > > > > Simon > > > > *From:* Edward Kmett <ekm...@gmail.com> > *Sent:* 25 April 2018 17:13 > *To:* Andrew Martin <andrew.thadd...@gmail.com> > *Cc:* Simon Peyton Jones <simo...@microsoft.com>; > core-libraries-commit...@haskell.org; Haskell Libraries < > librar...@haskell.org> > *Subject:* Re: [core libraries] Re: Name for unary unboxed one-tuple > > > > Argh. Not another color for the bikeshed. We were so close to a nice > universal consensus given your +1 on the thread. =) > > > > Let's end this and just go with Simon's Solo# as it had already achieved > a reasonably wide consensus on the thread and we can put this to bed. > > > > Simon: I'd replied a couple of weeks ago on the trac ticket to try to end > this, but apparently didn't visibly weigh in in a fashion that obviously > carried the full force of the committee. > > > > -Edward > > > > On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 8:40 AM, Andrew Martin <andrew.thadd...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > My vote is for Single/Single#. > > > > Also, in case there is any confusion around this, I was not a member of > the CLC when this issue was originally raised, but the committee has > accepted me since then. > > > > > > > > On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 4:28 AM, Simon Peyton Jones via Libraries < > librar...@haskell.org> wrote: > > Dear Libraries Committee > > Some time ago Andrew Martin asked you > <https://mail.haskell.org/pipermail/libraries/2018-January/028419.html> > what the name of the unary unboxed one-tuple type and data constructor > should be. The thread ran for a while, but you never came to a conclusion. > > Can we nail this one? You’ll see on Trac #14673 > <https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/14673#comment:19> that chessai > wants me to decide 😊. But it should really be you. > > To me, there seems to be something of a consensus around Solo#. > > Simon > > PS: actually I think Andrew may have addressed libraries@ rather than > core-libraries-committee@ by mistake. > > > _______________________________________________ > Libraries mailing list > librar...@haskell.org > http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libraries > <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fmail.haskell.org%2Fcgi-bin%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Flibraries&data=02%7C01%7Csimonpj%40microsoft.com%7C4ff70a93792c4364cfb208d5aac767fa%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C636602695779635893&sdata=02JPqT7mjKCaf76e2kBcaZfWhKjGfz2sA0ys%2BCMCztg%3D&reserved=0> > > > > > > -- > > -Andrew Thaddeus Martin > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "haskell-core-libraries" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to haskell-core-libraries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout > <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgroups.google.com%2Fd%2Foptout&data=02%7C01%7Csimonpj%40microsoft.com%7C4ff70a93792c4364cfb208d5aac767fa%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C636602695779635893&sdata=IyzanRPCyTGwq9ZOdETPkRMGIKOeqNEBUxbuK6Jbi4I%3D&reserved=0> > . > > > _______________________________________________ > Libraries mailing list > librar...@haskell.org > http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libraries >
_______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list ghc-devs@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs