good idea!

|  -----Original Message-----
|  From: Ömer Sinan Ağacan <omeraga...@gmail.com>
|  Sent: 18 June 2018 09:45
|  To: Simon Peyton Jones <simo...@microsoft.com>
|  Cc: ghc-devs <ghc-devs@haskell.org>
|  Subject: Re: DEBUG-on
|  
|  If we're going to test with a DEBUG-enabled compiler we may also want to
|  enable sanity checks. I've been recently using this a lot and it really
|  catches a lot of bugs that can go unnoticed without sanity checks. I
|  recently filed #15241 for some of the tests that currently fail the sanity
|  checks.
|  
|  Ömer
|  
|  Simon Peyton Jones via ghc-devs <ghc-devs@haskell.org>, 18 Haz 2018 Pzt,
|  11:35 tarihinde şunu yazdı:
|  >
|  > Ben
|  >
|  > We don’t really test with a DEBUG-enabled compiler.  And yet, those
|  assertions are all there for a reason.
|  >
|  > In our CI infrastructure, I wonder if we might do a regression-test run on
|  at least one architecture with DEBUG on?
|  >
|  > e.g. https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/14904
|  >
|  > Simon
|  >
|  > _______________________________________________
|  > ghc-devs mailing list
|  > ghc-devs@haskell.org
|  > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fmail.h
|  > askell.org%2Fcgi-bin%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fghc-devs&data=02%7C01%7Csi
|  > monpj%40microsoft.com%7C61cb7f7d0544447dd64c08d5d4f7dfdd%7C72f988bf86f
|  > 141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C636649083434417033&sdata=a%2FhgLYRxKsb
|  > 2Mh4RoH9KC1MuIqcf1gzv%2FGRyzc7Sh9w%3D&reserved=0
_______________________________________________
ghc-devs mailing list
ghc-devs@haskell.org
http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs

Reply via email to