Niklas Larsson <[email protected]> writes:

> Installing stuff system-wide without doing ‘make install’ would break
> my expectations for how the build works. Also, how would one return to
> a pristine state if it was done that way?
>
Hmm, I was assuming it would be up to the user to ensure that a
compatible Cabal is already registered in the user's package database.

Regardless, as I said in my other message, it's not clear to me that
this is something that we really want to introduce complexity to support.

Cheers,

- Ben

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
ghc-devs mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs

Reply via email to