That is a very good point, thank you! I have not thought about
incremental parsing. That's something I need to research before I
start the rewrite.
On Tue, Oct 9, 2018 at 1:06 AM Alan & Kim Zimmerman <alan.z...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I am not against this proposal, but want to raise a possible future concern.
>
> As part of improving the haskell tooling environment I am keen on making GHC
> incremental, and have started a proof of concept based in the same techniques
> as used in the tree-sitter library.
>
> This is achieved by modifying happy, and requires minimal changes to the
> existing Parser.y.
>
> It would be unfortunate if this possibility was prevented by this rewrite.
>
> Alan
_______________________________________________
ghc-devs mailing list
ghc-devs@haskell.org
http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
