For what it’s worth, I’ve never found phab / arc to be the bottle neck / actual time consuming piece of doing anything for ghc
It’s defintely the nicest code review substrate I’ve engaged with One question I have : how does the llvm org manage / handle their phabricator instance and or ci substrate. Maybe they have wisdom that can help ? On Thu, Nov 1, 2018 at 7:27 PM Vladislav Zavialov <vladis...@serokell.io> wrote: > To put my 2¢ – I will be happy with whatever service provides the most > reliable CI. > > In terms of workflow, I like Ben's suggestion: > > * Consider a PR to be a stack of differentials, with each commit > being an atomic change in that stack. > _______________________________________________ > ghc-devs mailing list > ghc-devs@haskell.org > http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs >
_______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list ghc-devs@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
