So IIUC Gitlab features: - Good multi-platform *hosted* CI or at least workable integration with other (existing) CI solutions - Hosted review tool that we don't have to maintain ourselves (though a little bit less good than Phabricator, allegedly) - familiar GitHub-like workflow with no requirement to install extra software locally - Reuse of GitHub credentials - Realistic path forward for migrating tickets from Trac
This combination sounds pretty good to me! Best, -- Mathieu Boespflug Founder at http://tweag.io. On Sun, 4 Nov 2018 at 16:27, Manuel M T Chakravarty <c...@justtesting.org> wrote: > > > Am 30.10.2018 um 10:07 schrieb Simon Marlow <marlo...@gmail.com>: > > > > I'm entirely happy to move, provided (1) whatever we move to provides the > > functionality we need, and (2) it's clearly what the community wants > > (considering both current and future contributors). In the past when moving > > to GitHub was brought up, there were a handful of core contributors who > > argued strongly in favour of Phabricator, do we think that's changed? Do we > > have any indication of whether the survey respondents who were > > anti-Phabricator would be pro- or anti-GitLab? > > FWIW, while I still think GitHub is preferable, GitLab would be an > improvement over Phabricator IMHO. > > Cheers, > Manuel > > _______________________________________________ > Ghc-devops-group mailing list > ghc-devops-gr...@haskell.org > https://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devops-group _______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list ghc-devs@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
