I don’t think there should be duplicates in either. Do you have a test case 
that shows duplicates?

Simon

From: ghc-devs <ghc-devs-boun...@haskell.org> On Behalf Of Csaba Hruska
Sent: 04 November 2018 11:22
To: ghc-devs@haskell.org
Subject: Re: StgRhsClosure freevar and argument name duplicates

Is it possible that GHC generates STG with invalid binding semantics for 
certain cases that the Cmm codegen fix or ignore?
This could explain my observations.
I've checked the Stg linter source (StgLint.hs ; GHC 8.2.2 and github master) 
and it does not check StgRhsClosure free var and binder list at all.
And the scope checker function (addInScopeVars) does not check for duplicates.

Any thoughts?

Cheers,
Csaba

On Sat, Nov 3, 2018 at 9:53 AM Csaba Hruska 
<csaba.hru...@gmail.com<mailto:csaba.hru...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hi,

Can StgRhsClosure's freevar list ([occ]) or argument list ([bndr]) contain 
duplicates?

Cheers,
Csaba

data GenStgRhs bndr occ
  = StgRhsClosure
        CostCentreStack         -- CCS to be attached (default is CurrentCCS)
        StgBinderInfo           -- Info about how this binder is used (see 
below)
        [occ]                   -- non-global free vars; a list, rather than
                                -- a set, because order is important
        !UpdateFlag             -- ReEntrant | Updatable | SingleEntry
        [bndr]                  -- arguments; if empty, then not a function;
                                -- as above, order is important.
        (GenStgExpr bndr occ)   -- body

_______________________________________________
ghc-devs mailing list
ghc-devs@haskell.org
http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs

Reply via email to