Simon Peyton Jones via ghc-devs <[email protected]> writes: > | Indeed this is a known issue that I have been working [1] with upstream > | to resolve. > > Thanks. I'm not equipped to express a well-informed opinion about what > the best thing to do is. But in the meantime I WOULD be grateful for > explicit workflow advice. Specifically: > > * What steps should I take to get a patch committed to master, > assuming I've done the review stuff and want to press "go"? > At the moment it's largely just a matter of when a bulk merge happens; I did a large merge on Wednesday and another yesterday.
However, as Matthew suggested I think it may make sense to try using Marge bot to eliminate this manual process with little cost. It doesn't take particularly long to put together a bulk merge but it does require some form of human intervention which generally implies latency. Cheers, - Ben
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list [email protected] http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
