On Sun, Mar 17, 2019 at 2:23 PM Brandon Allbery <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hm. You're probably right that it should only consider the locally defined > one, > Cool. > but I can see why it would do this > Can you elaborate? Perhaps, > and wonder if there's even a good way to constrain that check currently. > > indicates that you can see why it might be so based on knowledge of the implementation? -- Shayne Fletcher Language Engineer c: +1 917 699 7763 e: [email protected] Digital Asset Holdings, LLC 4 World Trade Center 150 Greenwich Street, 47th Floor <https://maps.google.com/?q=150+Greenwich+Street,+47th+Floor%C2%A0+%C2%A0+%C2%A0+%C2%A0+%C2%A0+New+York,+NY+10007,+USA&entry=gmail&source=g> New York, NY 10007, USA <https://maps.google.com/?q=150+Greenwich+Street,+47th+Floor%C2%A0+%C2%A0+%C2%A0+%C2%A0+%C2%A0+New+York,+NY+10007,+USA&entry=gmail&source=g> digitalasset.com <http://www.digitalasset.com/> -- This message, and any attachments, is for the intended recipient(s) only, may contain information that is privileged, confidential and/or proprietary and subject to important terms and conditions available at http://www.digitalasset.com/emaildisclaimer.html <http://www.digitalasset.com/emaildisclaimer.html>. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this message.
_______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list [email protected] http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
