Steps 3–4 are done: https://gitlab.haskell.org/ghc/ghc/commit/684dc290563769d456b6f1c772673d64307ab072 Step 5, as it turns out, is not needed: I was mistaken and GHC 8.8 was not affected. I got confused about the releases, it’s only 8.10 that would be affected, sorry about this. However, it’s good that we merged the fix before the ghc-8.10 branch is cut, which should happen mid-June according to https://www.haskell.org/ghc/blog/20190405-ghc-8.8-status.html
Thanks everyone for responding to this, I’ve got help with CI images and updating build configuration. All the best, - Vladislav > On 9 May 2019, at 10:35, Simon Marlow <[email protected]> wrote: > > Thanks for bringing this up. I've merged the PR and uploaded Happy 1.19.10 > to Hackage. Can someone else look at steps 3-5? > > Cheers > Simon > > On Wed, 8 May 2019 at 09:51, Vladislav Zavialov <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello ghc-devs, > > This February I did some changes to the parser that require higher rank types > support in ‘happy’. Unfortunately, as I discovered, happy’s --coerce option > is severely broken in the presence of higher rank types, so I had to disable > it. My benchmarks have shown a 10% slowdown from disabling --coerce > (https://gist.github.com/int-index/38af0c5dd801088dc1de59eca4e55df4). > > Alongside my changes I submitted a pull request to happy which fixes the > issue (https://github.com/simonmar/happy/pull/134), in the hope that it would > get merged, released, and I could re-enable --coerce in GHC ‘happy' > configuration. > > Unfortunately, my patch has been ignored to this day (for 3 months now), and > the performance regression reached 8.8-alpha. We need to act swiftly if we > want to avoid a performance regression in the actual release. Here’s what > needs to be done: > > 1. Merge https://github.com/simonmar/happy/pull/134 > 2. Release a new ‘happy’ > 3. (Optional) Specify in GHC’s build system that it builds only with the > latest 'happy' release > 4. Restore the --coerce option in GHC’s build system ‘happy’ configuration > 5. Backport it to the ghc-8.8 branch > > I have no access to do 1 & 2, I believe Simon Marlow does. I’d appreciate if > someone took care of 3, currently the build system does not install ‘happy’ > and assumes a system-wide installation without checking its version. This > means that users of all but the newly released version will encounter obscure > error messages. We need a version check. Then I will do 4, as planned, and > create a merge request for 5. > > All the best, > - Vladislav > _______________________________________________ > ghc-devs mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs _______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list [email protected] http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
