Simon Peyton Jones via ghc-devs <[email protected]> writes: > Thanks Ben. Did we agree to have > > * 3 explicit labels (high, normal, low) > > * With absence of a label indicating "has not been assigned a priority" > which you can also read as "needs triage". > > I would strongly prefer not to have > "no label" = "low priority" > as I described earlier > We actually have four labels (highest, high, normal, low), mirroring Trac. On further reflection I agree with you; "no label" = "normal priority" left a bit too much implicit.
Regardless, whether we want to equate the lack of a priority label with "needs triage" is another decision. I'm not opposed to this but I do wonder whether issue reporters might be tempted to set the ticket priority, thereby inadvertently circumventing the usual triage process. Cheers, - Ben
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list [email protected] http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
