Richard Eisenberg <r...@richarde.dev> writes: > Hi devs, > > I believe threadstatus-9333 is more fragile than it's listed as. See > https://gitlab.haskell.org/rae/ghc/-/jobs/163182 > <https://gitlab.haskell.org/rae/ghc/-/jobs/163182>, where I haven't > been anywhere near this area of the code... > Yes, you are correct; I fixed this earlier this week in !1789.
> Also, on a separate test, I found that compact_gc got killed. See > https://gitlab.haskell.org/rae/ghc/-/jobs/163526 > <https://gitlab.haskell.org/rae/ghc/-/jobs/163526>. > Hmm, it looks like it timed out in the ghci way. I would guess that the interpreter is simply too slow. Looking back at the test tracking database it seems this failure has only occurred twice since we started tracking. I have opened #17253 to track this and will mark the way as fragile. Cheers, - Ben
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list ghc-devs@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
