Somehow, I remember this conversation coming up recently, and I thought it was decided to remove these. Indeed, I'm surprised they're still around. Strike them down!
Thanks, Richard > On Jan 8, 2020, at 10:38 PM, Alan & Kim Zimmerman <alan.z...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I have got back into some GHC dev, and noticed that the various ForallXXX > type synonyms in Extension.hs are unused in GHC. > > In the early iteration, they were needed, but it seems not any more. > > Is there any reason they should not be removed? > > Alan > _______________________________________________ > ghc-devs mailing list > ghc-devs@haskell.org > http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs _______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list ghc-devs@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
