In that case it'd be good to move the discussion to Gitlab. Could you file an
issue?

I was able to reproduce on GHC HEAD. With debug runtime I consistently get this
assertion error:

    internal error: ASSERTION FAILED: file rts/Messages.c, line 95

        (GHC version 8.11.0.20200201 for x86_64_unknown_linux)
        Please report this as a GHC bug:  https://www.haskell.org/ghc/reportabug

In non-debug runtime it works fine maybe half of the time, in others I get a
panic in the GC.

Ömer

Harendra Kumar <harendra.ku...@gmail.com>, 3 Şub 2020 Pzt, 10:01
tarihinde şunu yazdı:
>
> Unfortunately, it is present in 8.8.2 as well.
>
> On Mon, 3 Feb 2020 at 11:22, Ömer Sinan Ağacan <omeraga...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> You should try with 8.8.2 which fixes a bug in the compacting GC (#17088).
>>
>> When debugging it's a good idea to use the latest minor release of your GHC
>> version (8.8.2 in your case), as minor releases fix bugs and usually do not
>> introduce new ones as they don't ship new features.
>>
>> If the problem still exists, unless you're interested in GHC hacking I think
>> most productive use of the time would be to make the reproduer smaller, and
>> collect as many data as possible, like which flags trigger/hide the bug.
>>
>> Some of the things you could check:
>>
>> - Build your program with `-dcore-lint -dstg-lint -dcmm-lint` and see if it
>>   builds.
>> - Build your program with `-debug` and run it, see if it crahes.
>> - Build your program with `-debug` and run it with `+RTS -DS` and see if the
>>   error message changes.
>>
>> But really you should try with 8.8.2 as first thing. It's possible that this 
>> is
>> another manifestation of #17088.
>>
>> Ömer
>>
>> Harendra Kumar <harendra.ku...@gmail.com>, 3 Şub 2020 Pzt, 01:26
>> tarihinde şunu yazdı:
>> >
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > While running a test-suite for the streaming library streamly I am 
>> > encountering a crash which seems to happen at random places at different 
>> > times. The common messages are:
>> >
>> > * Segmentation fault: 11
>> > *  internal error: scavenge_mark_stack: unimplemented/strange closure type 
>> > 24792696 @ 0x4200a623e0
>> > * internal error: update_fwd: unknown/strange object  223743520
>> >
>> > and several other such messages. Prima facie this looks like the memory is 
>> > getting corrupted/scribbled somehow. My first suspicion was that this 
>> > could be a problem in the streamly library code. But I have stripped down 
>> > the code to bare minimum and there is no C FFI code or no poking to memory 
>> > pointers.
>> >
>> > My next suspicion was the hspec/quickcheck testing code that is being used 
>> > in this test. I checked the hspec code to ensure that there is no C 
>> > code/pointer poking in any of the code involved. But no luck there as 
>> > well, still looking to further strip down that code.
>> >
>> > My suspicion now is moving more towards the GHC RTS. This issue only shows 
>> > when the following conditions are met:
>> >
>> > * hspec "parallel" combinator is used to run tests in parallel
>> > * streamly concurrent code is being tested which can create many threads
>> > * The GHC heap size is restricted to a small size ~32MB using "-M32M" rts 
>> > option.
>> > * It is consistently seen with GHC 8.6.5 as well as GHC 8.8.1
>> >
>> > It never occurs when the heap size is not restricted. I have seen random 
>> > crashes before as well with a "IO manager die" message, when using 
>> > concurrent networking IO with streamly. Though earlier it was not easily 
>> > reproducible, I stopped chasing it. But now it looks like that issue might 
>> > also be a manifestation of the same underlying problem.
>> >
>> > My guess is it could be something in the RTS concurrency/threading related 
>> > code. Let me know if the symptoms ring a bell or if you can point to 
>> > something specific based on the symptoms. Also, what are the usual 
>> > tools/methods/debugging aids/flags to debug such issues in GHC? If not a 
>> > GHC issue what are the possible ways in which such problem can be induced 
>> > by application code?
>> >
>> > Meanwhile, I am also trying to simplify the reproducing code further to 
>> > remove other factors as much as possible. The current code is at 
>> > https://github.com/composewell/streamly on the ghc-segfault branch. Run "$ 
>> > while true; do cabal run properties || break; done" in the shell and if 
>> > you are lucky it may crash soon. The test code is in "test/Prop.hs" - here 
>> > https://github.com/composewell/streamly/blob/ghc-segfault/test/Prop.hs .
>> >
>> > -harendra
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > ghc-devs mailing list
>> > ghc-devs@haskell.org
>> > http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
_______________________________________________
ghc-devs mailing list
ghc-devs@haskell.org
http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs

Reply via email to