Hi Ben, Thanks for reminding me about that document. Has it been officially ratified as our procedure of record? My guess is "no". What's it waiting on? That document has been around for quite some time now.
Thanks, Richard > On Feb 7, 2020, at 9:32 PM, Ben Gamari <b...@well-typed.com> wrote: > > Andreas Klebinger <klebinger.andr...@gmx.at> writes: > >> Hello devs, >> >> Recently in a MR discussion the topic came up of contributors being >> frustrated about lack of reviews. >> >> As a contributor and as a reviewer the lack of tools to find MR's in >> need of attention also frustrated me often. >> >> I suggest two new MR labels: >> > I believe we already have a solution to this problem, which is outlined > here [1]. I have created the necessary labels however haven't updated > our contributor documentation to reflect the new workflow. > > Cheers, > > - Ben > > > [1] > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1-xPFaYdwhAlwOO0PLGwN3PxFLpwsYwjtWsVVALbOREc/edit > _______________________________________________ > ghc-devs mailing list > ghc-devs@haskell.org > http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs _______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list ghc-devs@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
