Hi all,

I have seen a few posts from Sam Derbyshire here asking for feedback about 
plugin API design, and the responses have been minimal. This poses a design 
challenge, because the GHC folk who design the interface are sometimes distinct 
from the people who use the interface. We're trying to be good, seeking 
feedback from real, live clients. Is there a better way to do so than this 
mailing list? Example: we could create a Category on discourse.haskell.org, if 
that would reach the audience better. Or we could make a repo with issue 
trackers somewhere simply to track plugin design. What would work?

(I recognize that I'm asking in a perhaps-ineffective channel for advice, but I 
really don't have a better idea right now. Maybe some of you plugin authors are 
here and will point us in a better direction.)

Thanks,
Richard
_______________________________________________
ghc-devs mailing list
ghc-devs@haskell.org
http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs

Reply via email to