Hi Norman, https://github.com/haskell/haddock/issues/472 is a long-standing, related issue. Unfortunately I'm not aware of any workarounds.
Simon Am Do., 27. Jan. 2022 um 20:51 Uhr schrieb Norman Ramsey <n...@cs.tufts.edu>: > > In a new module I'm writing for GHC, I define a record type that has a > ton of named fields. Two of the fields have rather large types. > Unfortunately, at least with default settings, the Haddock > documentation that is well-nigh unreadable (image attached). Does > anyone have a workaround? Hécate? > > (If it's useful, a draft of the offending module can be found at > https://gitlab.haskell.org/ghc/ghc/-/blob/wip/backend-as-record/compiler/GHC/Driver/Backend/Record.hs.) > > > Norman > > > _______________________________________________ > ghc-devs mailing list > ghc-devs@haskell.org > http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs _______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list ghc-devs@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
