Simon Peyton Jones <simon.peytonjo...@gmail.com> writes: > I'm open-minded, but I *really* want the text to be readily readable *in > the original source file*. So > * Back-ticks are much better than `@` signs; the latter are too noisy. > * For code, backticks add clutter. Maybe just intentend text can be > code? (Unless it's part of a bulleted list.) > In Markdown region of text indented by at least four spaces denotes a code block element. Unfortunately, Haddock doesn't have a similarly noise-free syntax, requiring that lines of code blocks begin with `>`.
Cheers, - Ben
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list ghc-devs@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
