the bug for this is https://gitlab.haskell.org/ghc/ghc/-/issues/22954
On Tue, Apr 25, 2023 at 10:54 AM George Colpitts <george.colpi...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks Moritz. I went ahead and tried it. On a very simple smoke test I > observed that "-fllvm works" but "-O2 -fllvm" does not. It fails with > "Cannot use -O# with legacy PM.". There is already a bug for changing ghc > to work with the new pass manager. It wasn't clear to me that this would be > needed for llvm 16. It seems that it is. > > Cheers > George > > > > > On Mon, Apr 24, 2023 at 10:02 PM Moritz Angermann < > moritz.angerm...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi George, >> >> while I personally haven’t tried. I’d encourage you to just try. Unless >> they changed their textual IR (they don’t do that often anymore), it could >> just work. >> >> Whether or not you run into bugs for the specific target you are looking >> at, is hard to say without knowing the target. >> >> My suggestion would be to just try building your configuration with the >> llvm backend against llvm16, and run validate if you can. >> >> Cheers, >> Moritz >> >> On Tue, 25 Apr 2023 at 4:50 AM, George Colpitts < >> george.colpi...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Hi >>> >>> Does anybody know if llvm 16 works with ghc 9.6.1 ? >>> >>> Thanks >>> George >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> ghc-devs mailing list >>> ghc-devs@haskell.org >>> http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs >>> >>
_______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list ghc-devs@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
