Ben Gamari <b...@smart-cactus.org> writes: >> On Wed, Dec 04, 2024 at 10:44:13AM +0000, Tom Ellis wrote: >>> There is test in place to confirm that the API of base does not change >>> accidentally. >> [...] >> >> Just so everyone here is in the loop: >> >> My guess is that the CLC will consider this an unapproved change that >> should be reverted before release. >> > Unfortunately it appears that the situation is a bit worse than just an > Enum instance. > Thankfully it appears I was wrong here. The additional changes I report below are approved under CLC#263. The only problem here is the missing `Enum` and `Show` instances for `IoSubSystem`. I have amended the merge request (!13683) to address this.
Cheers, - Ben
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list ghc-devs@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
