It strikes me that separating packages that have a relationship to ghc always seems to introduce a maintenance burden. Even with the core relationships moved to ghc-base, this might be a problem.
brandon s allbery kf8nh [email protected] On Tue, Nov 25, 2025, 14:23 Matthew Pickering <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm trying to establish consensus around the next stages of the > reinstallable base project. > > It seems to me the next step is to move the `base` package out of the > GHC tree into a separate repo so it can be maintained like a normal > haskell package. > > If you have an opinion then please leave your feedback on this email > thread. > > The issue is discussed here: > https://github.com/haskell/core-libraries-committee/issues/375 > and also on discourse > > https://discourse.haskell.org/t/what-are-the-next-steps-for-reinstallable-base/13319 > > Cheers, > > Matt > _______________________________________________ > ghc-devs mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] >
_______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
