ghc-tickets  

Messages by Thread

• Re: [GHC] #4092: Floating point manipulation : ulp and coerce IEEE-754 Double# into Word64# GHC
  • Re: [GHC] #4092: Floating point manipulation : ulp and coerce IEEE-754 Double# into Word64# GHC
• [GHC] #8099: Alternate syntax for indicating when a function is "fully applied" for purposes of inlining GHC
  • Re: [GHC] #8099: Alternate syntax for indicating when a function is "fully applied" for purposes of inlining GHC
  • Re: [GHC] #8099: Alternate syntax for indicating when a function is "fully applied" for purposes of inlining GHC
  • Re: [GHC] #8099: Alternate syntax for indicating when a function is "fully applied" for purposes of inlining GHC
  • Re: [GHC] #8099: Alternate syntax for indicating when a function is "fully applied" for purposes of inlining GHC
  • Re: [GHC] #8099: Alternate syntax for indicating when a function is "fully applied" for purposes of inlining GHC
  • Re: [GHC] #8099: Alternate syntax for indicating when a function is "fully applied" for purposes of inlining GHC
  • Re: [GHC] #8099: Alternate syntax for indicating when a function is "fully applied" for purposes of inlining GHC
  • Re: [GHC] #8099: Alternate syntax for indicating when a function is "fully applied" for purposes of inlining GHC
  • Re: [GHC] #8099: Alternate syntax for indicating when a function is "fully applied" for purposes of inlining GHC
  • Re: [GHC] #8099: Alternate syntax for indicating when a function is "fully applied" for purposes of inlining GHC
  • Re: [GHC] #8099: Alternate syntax for indicating when a function is "fully applied" for purposes of inlining GHC
  • Re: [GHC] #8099: Alternate syntax for indicating when a function is "fully applied" for purposes of inlining GHC
• [GHC] #8098: Faulty Word64 arithmetic if optimized GHC
  • Re: [GHC] #8098: Faulty Word64 arithmetic if optimized GHC
  • Re: [GHC] #8098: Faulty Word64 arithmetic if optimized GHC
• [GHC] #8097: internal error: getMBlock: mmap: Operation not permitted GHC
  • Re: [GHC] #8097: internal error: getMBlock: mmap: Operation not permitted GHC
  • Re: [GHC] #8097: internal error: getMBlock: mmap: Operation not permitted GHC
  • Re: [GHC] #8097: internal error: getMBlock: mmap: Operation not permitted GHC
  • Re: [GHC] #8097: internal error: getMBlock: mmap: Operation not permitted GHC
  • Re: [GHC] #8097: internal error: getMBlock: mmap: Operation not permitted GHC
  • Re: [GHC] #8097: internal error: getMBlock: mmap: Operation not permitted GHC
• [GHC] #8096: Add fudge-factor for performance tests run on non-validate builds GHC
• [GHC] #8095: TypeFamilies painfully slow GHC
  • Re: [GHC] #8095: TypeFamilies painfully slow GHC
  • Re: [GHC] #8095: TypeFamilies painfully slow GHC
• Re: [GHC] #5289: Can't use ghci with a library linked against libstdc++ GHC
  • Re: [GHC] #5289: Can't use ghci with a library linked against libstdc++ GHC
• Re: [GHC] #8021: Multiple constraint classes - the alternative to superclass GHC
• Re: [GHC] #7935: Syntactic sugar for comonads GHC
• [GHC] #8094: Intermittent segfault when using ghc-7.6.3 -e on OSX 10.6.8 GHC
  • Re: [GHC] #8094: Intermittent segfault when using ghc-7.6.3 -e on OSX 10.6.8 GHC
  • Re: [GHC] #8094: Intermittent segfault when using ghc-7.6.3 -e on OSX 10.6.8 GHC
  • Re: [GHC] #8094: Intermittent segfault when using ghc-7.6.3 -e on OSX 10.6.8 GHC
  • Re: [GHC] #8094: Intermittent segfault when using ghc-7.6.3 -e on OSX 10.6.8 GHC
• Re: [GHC] #7814: panic in PPC NCG GHC
  • Re: [GHC] #7814: panic in PPC NCG GHC
  • Re: [GHC] #7814: panic in PPC NCG GHC
• [GHC] #8093: Runtime Internal Error with setNumCapabilities 1 GHC
  • Re: [GHC] #8093: Runtime Internal Error with setNumCapabilities 1 GHC
• [GHC] #8092: Map.unionWithMaybe GHC
  • Re: [GHC] #8092: Map.unionWithMaybe GHC
• [GHC] #8091: retry# lacks strictness information GHC
  • Re: [GHC] #8091: retry# lacks strictness information GHC
  • Re: [GHC] #8091: retry# lacks strictness information GHC
  • Re: [GHC] #8091: retry# lacks strictness information GHC
  • Re: [GHC] #8091: retry# lacks strictness information GHC
  • Re: [GHC] #8091: retry# lacks strictness information GHC
  • Re: [GHC] #8091: retry# lacks strictness information GHC
• Re: [GHC] #7266: Allow fractional-looking integer literals GHC
  • Re: [GHC] #7266: Allow fractional-looking integer literals GHC
  • Re: [GHC] #7266: Allow fractional-looking integer literals GHC
• [GHC] #8090: MetaKinds - PolyKinds generalization GHC
  • Re: [GHC] #8090: MetaKinds - PolyKinds generalization GHC
  • Re: [GHC] #8090: MetaKinds - PolyKinds generalization GHC
  • Re: [GHC] #8090: MetaKinds - PolyKinds generalization GHC
  • Re: [GHC] #8090: MetaKinds - PolyKinds generalization GHC
  • Re: [GHC] #8090: MetaKinds - PolyKinds generalization GHC
  • Re: [GHC] #8090: MetaKinds - PolyKinds generalization GHC
  • Re: [GHC] #8090: MetaKinds - PolyKinds generalization GHC
• [GHC] #8089: Implementation of GHC.Event.Poll.poll is broken due to bad coercion GHC
  • Re: [GHC] #8089: Implementation of GHC.Event.Poll.poll is broken due to bad coercion GHC
  • Re: [GHC] #8089: Implementation of GHC.Event.Poll.poll is broken due to bad coercion GHC
  • Re: [GHC] #8089: Implementation of GHC.Event.Poll.poll is broken due to bad coercion GHC
  • Re: [GHC] #8089: Implementation of GHC.Event.Poll.poll is broken due to bad coercion GHC
  • Re: [GHC] #8089: Implementation of GHC.Event.Poll.poll is broken due to bad coercion GHC
  • Re: [GHC] #8089: Implementation of GHC.Event.Poll.poll is broken due to bad coercion GHC
• [GHC] #8088: Disposable types language extension GHC
  • Re: [GHC] #8088: Disposable types language extension GHC
  • Re: [GHC] #8088: Disposable types language extension GHC
• Re: [GHC] #7275: Give more detailed information about PINNED data in a heap profile GHC
• [GHC] #8087: Bug in IO manager when increasing the number of capabilities GHC
  • Re: [GHC] #8087: Bug in IO manager when increasing the number of capabilities GHC
  • Re: [GHC] #8087: Bug in IO manager when increasing the number of capabilities GHC
• Re: [GHC] #7779: building GHC overwrites the installed package database if GHC_PACKAGE_PATH is set GHC
• [GHC] #8086: Minimal install for GHC GHC
  • Re: [GHC] #8086: Minimal install for GHC GHC
  • Re: [GHC] #8086: Minimal install for GHC GHC
• Re: [GHC] #7148: generalized newtype and type families is unsound GHC
  • Re: [GHC] #7148: generalized newtype and type families is unsound GHC
  • Re: [GHC] #7148: generalized newtype and type families is unsound GHC
• Re: [GHC] #5498: Generalized newtype deriving allows creating of instances I can't create by hand GHC
• Re: [GHC] #4846: Newtype derving used wrongly GHC
  • Re: [GHC] #4846: Newtype derving used wrongly GHC
  • Re: [GHC] #4846: Newtype derving used wrongly GHC
• Re: [GHC] #1496: Newtypes and type families combine to produce inconsistent FC(X) axiom sets GHC
  • Re: [GHC] #1496: Newtypes and type families combine to produce inconsistent FC(X) axiom sets GHC
  • Re: [GHC] #1496: Newtypes and type families combine to produce inconsistent FC(X) axiom sets GHC
• [GHC] #8085: Both GHC and its installer don't run on current Debian Stable GHC
  • Re: [GHC] #8085: Both GHC and its installer don't run on current Debian Stable GHC
  • Re: [GHC] #8085: Both GHC and its installer don't run on current Debian Stable GHC
  • Re: [GHC] #8085: Both GHC and its installer don't run on current Debian Stable GHC
• [GHC] #8084: Enabling PolyKinds makes some type errors weird GHC
  • Re: [GHC] #8084: Enabling PolyKinds makes some type errors weird GHC
  • Re: [GHC] #8084: Enabling PolyKinds makes some type errors weird GHC
  • Re: [GHC] #8084: Enabling PolyKinds makes some type errors weird GHC
  • Re: [GHC] #8084: Enabling PolyKinds makes some type errors weird GHC
  • Re: [GHC] #8084: Enabling PolyKinds makes some type errors weird GHC
• Re: [GHC] #6135: Unboxed Booleans GHC
  • Re: [GHC] #6135: Unboxed Booleans GHC
  • Re: [GHC] #6135: Unboxed Booleans GHC
  • Re: [GHC] #6135: Unboxed Booleans GHC
  • Re: [GHC] #6135: Unboxed Booleans GHC
  • Re: [GHC] #6135: Unboxed Booleans GHC
  • Re: [GHC] #6135: Unboxed Booleans GHC
  • Re: [GHC] #6135: Unboxed Booleans GHC
  • Re: [GHC] #6135: Unboxed Booleans GHC
  • Re: [GHC] #6135: Unboxed Booleans GHC
• [GHC] #8083: setNumCapabilities broken in HEAD GHC
  • Re: [GHC] #8083: setNumCapabilities broken in HEAD GHC
  • Re: [GHC] #8083: setNumCapabilities broken in HEAD GHC
  • Re: [GHC] #8083: setNumCapabilities broken in HEAD GHC
  • Re: [GHC] #8083: setNumCapabilities broken in HEAD GHC
  • Re: [GHC] #8083: setNumCapabilities broken in HEAD GHC
  • Re: [GHC] #8083: setNumCapabilities broken in HEAD GHC
  • Re: [GHC] #8083: setNumCapabilities broken in HEAD GHC
  • Re: [GHC] #8083: setNumCapabilities broken in HEAD GHC
  • Re: [GHC] #8083: setNumCapabilities broken in HEAD GHC
  • Re: [GHC] #8083: setNumCapabilities broken in HEAD GHC
  • Re: [GHC] #8083: setNumCapabilities broken in HEAD GHC
• Re: [GHC] #7986: make newBroadcastTChanIO match newBroadcastTChan GHC
• [GHC] #8082: Ordering of assembly blocks affects performance GHC
  • Re: [GHC] #8082: Ordering of assembly blocks affects performance GHC
• Re: [GHC] #7134: ghc-7.6.0.20120810-x86_64-windows.exe -> internal error R_X86_64_PC32 GHC
  • Re: [GHC] #7134: ghc-7.6.0.20120810-x86_64-windows.exe -> internal error R_X86_64_PC32 GHC
  • Re: [GHC] #7134: ghc-7.6.0.20120810-x86_64-windows.exe -> internal error R_X86_64_PC32 GHC
  • Re: [GHC] #7134: ghc-7.6.0.20120810-x86_64-windows.exe -> internal error R_X86_64_PC32 GHC
  • Re: [GHC] #7134: ghc-7.6.0.20120810-x86_64-windows.exe -> internal error R_X86_64_PC32 GHC
  • Re: [GHC] #7134: ghc-7.6.0.20120810-x86_64-windows.exe -> internal error R_X86_64_PC32 GHC
  • Re: [GHC] #7134: ghc-7.6.0.20120810-x86_64-windows.exe -> internal error R_X86_64_PC32 GHC
  • Re: [GHC] #7134: ghc-7.6.0.20120810-x86_64-windows.exe -> internal error R_X86_64_PC32 GHC
  • Re: [GHC] #7134: ghc-7.6.0.20120810-x86_64-windows.exe -> internal error R_X86_64_PC32 GHC
  • Re: [GHC] #7134: ghc-7.6.0.20120810-x86_64-windows.exe -> internal error R_X86_64_PC32 GHC
• [GHC] #8081: let form in do block requires in? GHC
  • Re: [GHC] #8081: let form in do block requires in? GHC
• Re: [GHC] #6050: Documentation for option -Wall and warning -fwarn-unrecognised-pragmas GHC
• [GHC] #8080: Typechecking error: "Could not deduce (m ~ m1)..." GHC
  • Re: [GHC] #8080: Typechecking error: "Could not deduce (m ~ m1)..." GHC
• [GHC] #8079: Redo T7919 with a cabal file GHC
  • Re: [GHC] #8079: Redo T7919 and TH_spliceE5_prof with a cabal file (was: Redo T7919 with a cabal file) GHC
• Re: [GHC] #7970: Thread GC frees roots before thread actually finishes GHC
  • Re: [GHC] #7970: Thread GC frees roots before thread actually finishes GHC
• [GHC] #8078: Core lint failure for profiled code GHC
  • Re: [GHC] #8078: Core lint failure for profiled code GHC
• Re: [GHC] #3658: Dynamically link GHCi (and use system linker) on platforms that support it GHC
  • Re: [GHC] #3658: Dynamically link GHCi (and use system linker) on platforms that support it GHC
  • Re: [GHC] #3658: Dynamically link GHCi (and use system linker) on platforms that support it GHC
  • Re: [GHC] #3658: Dynamically link GHCi (and use system linker) on platforms that support it GHC
  • Re: [GHC] #3658: Dynamically link GHCi (and use system linker) on platforms that support it GHC
• [GHC] #8077: Make write_barrier and friends show up with KEEP_INLINES GHC
  • Re: [GHC] #8077: Make write_barrier and friends show up with KEEP_INLINES GHC
  • Re: [GHC] #8077: Make write_barrier and friends show up with KEEP_INLINES GHC
  • Re: [GHC] #8077: Make write_barrier and friends show up with KEEP_INLINES GHC
• Re: [GHC] #7399: Test Posix004 fails in test-suite GHC
  • Re: [GHC] #7399: Test Posix004 fails in test-suite GHC
  • Re: [GHC] #7399: Test Posix004 fails in test-suite GHC
  • Re: [GHC] #7399: Test Posix004 fails in test-suite GHC
• Re: [GHC] #7978: Profiling broken GHC
  • Re: [GHC] #7978: Profiling broken GHC
  • Re: [GHC] #7978: Profiling broken GHC
  • Re: [GHC] #7978: Profiling broken GHC
  • Re: [GHC] #7978: Profiling broken GHC
  • Re: [GHC] #7978: Profiling broken GHC
  • Re: [GHC] #7978: Profiling broken GHC
  • Re: [GHC] #7978: Profiling broken GHC
  • Re: [GHC] #7978: Profiling broken GHC
  • Re: [GHC] #7978: Profiling broken GHC
  • Re: [GHC] #7978: Profiling broken GHC
  • Re: [GHC] #7978: Profiling broken GHC
  • Re: [GHC] #7978: Profiling broken GHC
  • Re: [GHC] #7978: Profiling broken GHC
  • Re: [GHC] #7978: Profiling broken GHC
• [GHC] #8076: `prompt2` not honoured in `:set +m`-style continuations GHC
  • Re: [GHC] #8076: `prompt2` not honoured in `:set +m`-style continuations GHC
• [GHC] #8075: `:show imports` unknown to tab-completion GHC
  • Re: [GHC] #8075: `:show imports` unknown to tab-completion GHC
• [GHC] #8074: `:show linker` not mentioned in `:help` GHC
  • Re: [GHC] #8074: `:show linker` not mentioned in `:help` GHC
• Re: [GHC] #3676: realToFrac doesn't sanely convert between floating types GHC
• Re: [GHC] #7883: enable GHC LLVM backend to use LLVM provided CAS / Atomicity primitives? GHC
  • Re: [GHC] #7883: enable GHC LLVM backend to use LLVM provided CAS / Atomicity primitives? GHC
  • Re: [GHC] #7883: enable GHC LLVM backend to use LLVM provided CAS / Atomicity primitives? GHC
  • Re: [GHC] #7883: enable GHC LLVM backend to use LLVM provided CAS / Atomicity primitives? GHC
  • Re: [GHC] #7883: enable GHC LLVM backend to use LLVM provided CAS / Atomicity primitives? GHC
  • Re: [GHC] #7883: enable GHC LLVM backend to use LLVM provided CAS / Atomicity primitives? GHC
  • Re: [GHC] #7883: enable GHC LLVM backend to use LLVM provided CAS / Atomicity primitives? GHC
  • Re: [GHC] #7883: enable GHC LLVM backend to use LLVM provided CAS / Atomicity primitives? GHC
  • Re: [GHC] #7883: enable GHC LLVM backend to use LLVM provided CAS / Atomicity primitives? GHC
  • Re: [GHC] #7883: enable GHC LLVM backend to use LLVM provided CAS / Atomicity primitives? GHC
  • Re: [GHC] #7883: enable GHC LLVM backend to use LLVM provided CAS / Atomicity primitives? GHC
  • Re: [GHC] #7883: enable GHC LLVM backend to use LLVM provided CAS / Atomicity primitives? GHC
• Re: [GHC] #4466: Add extension for type application GHC
• Re: [GHC] #5296: Add explicit type applications GHC
• Re: [GHC] #6063: GHC's build-time ld-flag checks are problematic GHC
  • Re: [GHC] #6063: GHC's build-time ld-flag checks are problematic GHC
• Re: [GHC] #7574: Register allocator chokes on certain branches with literals GHC
  • Re: [GHC] #7574: Register allocator chokes on certain branches with literals GHC

• Earlier messages
• Later messages