On Dec 10, 2007 10:56 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Quoting Pascal Giard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > On Dec 6, 2007 12:29 AM, Tristan Gingold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Wed, Dec 05, 2007 at 09:33:38AM -0500, Pascal Giard wrote: > > > > Finally, note that it still doesn't work in native 64bit, i need to > > > > run in a 32bit chroot or on a native 32bit cpu. Do you have tips/hints > > > > on tracking the root of the issue? > > > > > > Which version of GHDL are you using in both cases ? > > > > They are the exact same versions, compiled with the same GNAT version. > > They're from current Debian unstable. > > > > Namely: > > GHDL 0.26 (20070408) [Sokcho edition] > > Compiled with GNAT Version: 4.2.1 (Debian 4.2.1-0) > > > It's difficult for me to debug because I don't have an x86-64. But,
I can provide you with shell access to my dev computer. Of course, i would install anything you need and comply to any reasonable request (e.g. write access to /usr/local). Would that help? > * does a simple vhdl-only example work on i386 and x86-64 ? yes. > * does a simple vpi example (hello world, without callback) work on each > platform? yes. Note that the issue seems to be tied to one specific callback: cbReadOnlySync[h]. Weird enough, a more complicated design (a programmable FIR instead of the simple XOR2 i had shared on the list) sometimes work but simulation time has a weird offset. > Are you sure to use the right compiler for the vpi module ? Huh... What is the right compiler? Cheers, -Pascal -- Homepage (http://organact.mine.nu) Debian GNU/Linux (http://www.debian.org) LACIME: École de technologie supérieure (http://lacime.etsmtl.ca) _______________________________________________ Ghdl-discuss mailing list Ghdl-discuss@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/ghdl-discuss
