Hello everybody, Tristan Gingold wrote: >> Is the GPL licensing of GRT is a deliberate choice ? > Yes. That's interesting :-)
I understand the possible reasons but usually, programs compiled with GCC are not automatically under GPL, so the situation is probably not obvious for most users. >> Perhaps I am mistaking about the licensing of the generated >> executable... I need clarifications :) > I thought that nobody would need to distribute a ghdl binary. > Do you really need to do that ? I think that it is the wrong question (even if justified). If something like that is possible then it will be done. It is only a matter of time before it becomes commonplace and someone finds new uses for this method of distribution. Maybe you could dual-licence the GRT and paying customers could distribute the binaries at will, and you would earn some money to finance your work ? Just dreaming, > Tristan. yg -- http://ygdes.com / http://yasep.org _______________________________________________ Ghdl-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/ghdl-discuss
