> On Wed, 08 Jan 2014 06:33:39 +0100 > [email protected] wrote: > > from a user point of view, I just need a GHDL that works... > > Groovy. A working GHDL is probably the general consensus.
Sure. I think we don't really have the resources to maintain 2 or 3 branches. I far prefer to have the development tree always in good shape (and we now have a not trivial testsuite), and be able to create a release whenever we want. > > Ideally, one that Tristan endorses. > > Okay. I imagine every release must be sanctioned by [at least one of] > the project administrators. If GHDL passes the test, it is in good shape. I also have my private test suite, and I will test GHDL on it. Tristan. _______________________________________________ Ghdl-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/ghdl-discuss
