David Koontz wrote:
the ghdl-0.29-1 download link on ghdl.free.fr pointed
to ghdl-0.29 until I patched the link about a year ago.
In the mean time we had Windows users swearing
ghdl was broken.
The outdated links[1] were confusing.
But note that both the 0.29 and the 0.29.1 Windows builds *are*
broken[2].
0.25 was the last preceding Windows build I found without the strange
stack issues, but its' link is invisible[3].
Don't all the changes invalidate any testing being done
by others? It's called trying to hit a moving target.
I have not had a chance to test the latest updates on Windows XP.
The windows build infrastructure will need updating for the IEEE
library changes.
I added a wiki page[4] over the holidays, describing how I manually
built and tested the Windows mcode build from an earlier snapshot.
-Brian
[1] https://mail.gna.org/public/ghdl-discuss/2011-01/msg00007.html
[2] https://mail.gna.org/public/ghdl-discuss/2011-03/msg00005.html
[3] https://mail.gna.org/public/ghdl-discuss/2011-03/msg00007.html
[4]
http://sourceforge.net/p/ghdl-updates/wiki/build%20mcode%20ghdl%20windows/
_______________________________________________
Ghdl-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/ghdl-discuss
