On Wed, 2014-10-29 at 20:42 +0100, Tristan Gingold wrote:
> I have just finished to implement package interface.
> Well, at least enough to support all the ieee 2008 packages.
> 
> I think this is a milestone, although vhdl 2008 is still far
> from being fully supported.
> 
> I'd like to make the release 0.32: I will run tests, fix
> possible bugs, test with gcc 4.9.2 (or 4.9.1) and then
> create the branch.

Excellent news! I've been meaning to ask... I also think it's a good
time to stabilise 0.32. 

Despite a slowdown in downloads over the Summer, it looks like October
might be the best month for downloads so far, and ghdl's on track for
well over 5000 downloads in a year.

I apologise I've not done any technical work since my wife's death but I
am slowly beginning to think about it again. I want to build with 4.9
(stock Debian this time) and then maybe 4.10 (now called 5.0) and see if
I can stay ahead of the game.

So ... 0.32 has a good subset of VHDL-2008 support.

I know you tried OSVVM 2014.1, and though 2014.02 was talked about, I
believe 2014.1 is still current. That should please Jim Lewis!

1) Does it support Daniel Kho's VHDL-2008 feature requests (on gna.org)?
2) What is the intended status of the backends? (subject to testing in
this phase...
a) gcc of course
b) mcode (for x86-32) presumably
c) is the LLVM backend still experimental? Should we announce it and
start to get feedback from early adopters, with a view to making it part
of 0.33?
d) You have added a "simulator" mode ... what is its status?

> Volunteers are welcome for testing or creating releases.

Time I got busy then!

I've been reading your commits ... basically just watching in awe!

> For 0.33, I'd like to concentrate on usuability: add
> a vzt dumper, improve speed.  Adding new vhdl 2008 won't
> be the priority for 0.33

OK. Is it possible to look at an efficient "packed array of boolean"
implementation of bit_vector? It might please YG, and set the cat among
the pigeons in the current integer/logical/shift/modular debate if ghdl
was the industry leader in speed there!

- Brian


_______________________________________________
Ghdl-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/ghdl-discuss

Reply via email to