On Sun, 2014-11-02 at 16:10 +0100, Tristan Gingold wrote: > On 02/11/14 16:01, Paul Koning wrote: > > > > On Nov 2, 2014, at 7:31 AM, Tristan Gingold <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> On 02/11/14 11:51, Brian Drummond wrote:> Probably Simon Wright. He put it > >> on Sourceforge at > >>> > >>> https://sourceforge.net/projects/gnuada/files/GNAT_GCC%20Mac%20OS% > >>> 20X/4.9.1/ > >> > >> Yes, that's the URL. > >> > >>> Tn any case, isn't the mcode version expected to fail on amd64? It's a > >>> JIT compiler for x686 (32-bit).
> > I have a 64 bit GCC based GNAT on my Mac OS 10.9 machine. And yes, that > > actually is interesting; it allows me to link in non-VHDL modules to do > > stuff. > > Maybe I misunderstood Brian. With a 64 bit GNAT on Mac, you can build > ghdl using gcc as back-end; but you cannot build mcode version of ghdl. My point was that the original question was specifically about a segfault while building the mcode version for 64 bits. Which won't work. Today, the gcc version is the way to go, or experiment with the LLVM version. I didn't know LLVM had JIT capabilities : that does make it interesting as a replacement for mcode! - Brian _______________________________________________ Ghdl-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/ghdl-discuss
