On 26/03/15 14:21, Adam Jensen wrote:
On Thu, 26 Mar 2015 08:03:45 +0100
Tristan Gingold <[email protected]> wrote:
On 25/03/15 17:10, Adam Jensen wrote:
On Wed, 25 Mar 2015 08:02:26 +0100
Tristan Gingold <[email protected]> wrote:
Great. Did you try vpi plugins ? I am not sure they will work.
I haven't been able to find any GHDL-VPI documentation.
(OTOH, that's a minor issue).
It would be nice if all of the capabilities of the tool were enabled and
functioning on the BSD's.
OTOH, if nobody uses that feature this restriction is not a real issue!
Cool. I'll add it to my to-do/watch list and when an opportunity arises to
investigate it further, I can revisit it. So far, 0.32rc2 (--rev 3f2fcad4d876)
looks pretty good on FreeBSD-x86 (comparable to Linux except for the potential
VPI issue (though, I can't verify whether or not it's actually an issue until I
figure out how it works (are these nested parenthesis annoying? (lisp warped my
mind)))). I haven't explored any gna test issues, yet. Currently, on Linux and
FreeBSD, they stop at:
GNA dir bug09:
analyze univ1.vhdl
elaborate and simulate (failure expected) univ1
univ1.vhdl:19:5:@0ms:(assertion error): i = -1
./univ1:error: error expected, but none occured
ghdl: compilation error
This one also fails on linux with the gcc backend.
Tristan.
_______________________________________________
Ghdl-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/ghdl-discuss
