Hello, John Sullivan writes:
> I would still suggest trying to get a devroom of GNU technical talks, > taking last year's proposal and making it more technical. > > I think the way to go to increase chance of acceptance is to actually > make the proposal broader, not narrower. This may well make sense. Unfortunately I will not have the time to rewrite last year's proposal to make it more technical in substance before the deadline, so I will have to submit the proposal as is this year. We can revisit this alternate strategy next year — sorry if this feels like a cop out! Best wishes, Alex John Sullivan writes: > [email protected] (Ludovic Courtès) writes: > >> Howdy! >> >> Alex, do you know how much time we’d have to submit talks in the other >> tracks after we’ve received a notification for the devroom? >> >> I agree with Alex that we should try to get the devroom anyway (after >> all, it succeeded two years ago.) We just need to make sure we have a >> workable plan B. > > I would still suggest trying to get a devroom of GNU technical talks, > taking last year's proposal and making it more technical. > > I think the way to go to increase chance of acceptance is to actually > make the proposal broader, not narrower. > > -john -- Sent with my mu4e
