Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Yes. But I don't think we should always add the alpha channel. Just > do it automatically as soon as there is more than a single layer in > the image. > what remains in this case is that things like clear selection (on the bg layer) suddenly start to behave differently, depending if there's a layer above the background layer or not. Ick. I'd vote for always having an alpha layer. seems to be cleaner conceptually. jtl . _______________________________________________ Gimp-developer mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
- [Gimp-developer] RGB vs RGBA - why Add Alpha Channel? Raphael Quinet
- Re: [Gimp-developer] RGB vs RGBA - why Add Alpha Ch... Raphael Quinet
- Re: [Gimp-developer] RGB vs RGBA - why Add Alpha Ch... Sven Neumann
- Re: [Gimp-developer] RGB vs RGBA - why Add Alpha Ch... Jens Lautenbacher
- Re: [Gimp-developer] RGB vs RGBA - why Add Alpha Ch... Zachary Beane
- Re: [Gimp-developer] RGB vs RGBA - why Add Alpha Ch... Seth Burgess
- Re: [Gimp-developer] RGB vs RGBA - why Add Alpha Ch... Jens Lautenbacher
- Re: [Gimp-developer] RGB vs RGBA - why Add Alpha Ch... Zachary Beane
- Re: [Gimp-developer] RGB vs RGBA - why Add Alph... Seth Burgess
- Re: [Gimp-developer] RGB vs RGBA - why Add Alpha Ch... Raphael Quinet
- Re: [Gimp-developer] RGB vs RGBA - why Add Alpha Ch... Jens Lautenbacher
- Re: [Gimp-developer] RGB vs RGBA - why Add Alpha Ch... Sven Neumann
- Re: [Gimp-developer] RGB vs RGBA - why Add Alpha Ch... egger