On Sat, Feb 24, 2001 at 06:16:13PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > COW is indeed a good thing. However I assume you address the mentioned > memory overhead with your answer and I'm not sure how you would avoid > it with copy-on-write. You're completely right. It was a thinko on my part, I have been starting at assoc/ non-assoc alpha channels for too long and forgotten that the storage is inline and thus not amenable to COW. Sorry everyone. Nick. _______________________________________________ Gimp-developer mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
- Re: [Gimp-developer] RGB vs RGBA - why Add Alpha Channel... Jens Lautenbacher
- Re: [Gimp-developer] RGB vs RGBA - why Add Alpha Channel... Zachary Beane
- Re: [Gimp-developer] RGB vs RGBA - why Add Alpha Channel... Raphael Quinet
- Re: [Gimp-developer] RGB vs RGBA - why Add Alpha Channel... Jens Lautenbacher
- Re: [Gimp-developer] RGB vs RGBA - why Add Alpha Channel... Sven Neumann
- Re: [Gimp-developer] RGB vs RGBA - why Add Alpha Channel... egger
- Re: [Gimp-developer] RGB vs RGBA - why Add Alpha Channel... Nick Lamb
- Re: [Gimp-developer] RGB vs RGBA - why Add Alpha Ch... Austin Donnelly
- Re: [Gimp-developer] RGB vs RGBA - why Add Alpha Channel... egger
- Nick Lamb