wow,
Thorsten Wilms' reply is exactly the type of information
I am looking for.
> I could see myself using text in GIMP for
> - text in mockups
> - annotations
> - as integral part of ... poster design
>
> For mockups, I prefer Inkscape, these days. GIMP only wins for some
> modifications of screenshots.
>
> With annotations I mean simple text placed on images. Usually small and
> without any effect or only effects like drop shadow or blurring the
> background for better legibility. This is all about convenience: to not have
> an additional export/import/export with another application involved.
>
> For text as integral part of a poster (or similar setting), it's hard to
> compete with the flexibility and rich functionality of vector graphics
> applications like Inkscape. Reasons to use GIMP could be a need for tricky
> blending and pixel-based effects like grungy edges.
>
> That would be text that is primarily an element of a graphical composition,
> then. In contrast to text where its exact shape and placement are secondary.
> I would not speak of a supporting role, as the text might well take center
> stage and/or be the backbone of the work.
>
> Such text, that is all about explicit shapes and exact/direct placement, is
> the opposite to the result of some raw string of text with a set of
> formatting rules applied to it.
--ps
founder + principal interaction architect
man + machine interface works
http://blog.mmiworks.net: on interaction architecture
_______________________________________________
gimp-developer-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer-list
